Rachel: Thank you for renewing my faith in the web's brilliance. Even if you may have been thinking you should have been doing something else.
***
On review I did not honor the weight of history she carries. I remember in my mid 20s, younger than Sarah today, finding it difficult to blend with my singles ward for I had to pretend I didn't carry that weight. Trying to be younger, brighter. To forget, for example, the waves of fashion I'd already known, embracing the current as not only delightful but not new and simply absolute. This post has become my appology to Sarah. To all the things I don't know has happened, and wasn't open to find out.
What drew me to write this arose out of deciding to review her blog, sensing at that point only vaguely that I had missed something important in my visit. A glance at a picture of she and a friend and for some reason it hit me in a shocking wave. The mass and volume of Sarah's history. I checked and saw that her blog goes back years, how did that much time pass? I remember when she let us know she'd started it. Why didn't I read it then, what was I doing? That is the chunk of time that blurs together under "Job at SCI." How long did that last, about a year? The measure of time that once covered life chunks: 5th grade then 6th. Maybe it was two years, because I changed offices in the middle. Add this unfinished chunk called, perhaps, "At home," unfinished so not a full year. Its been 2 1/2 years, certainly not 5.
I stopped at the picture, and moved to the end, which is the beginning, I Blog. Intending to read in a great binge, like a glance at Hulu growing to a lost month or three. But Sarah's words slowly woke me. Perhaps simply because its real life, my real blood. Her words directly connect my real experience. By the dozen mark, back in '04, Sarah's post accidentally urged me to goodness. I realized I wanted to stop, needed to stop. To go back to my life. Hulu does not do this. Hulu does not do this. Writing this post does not do this. I do not understand the ramafications of this. What does this mean?
4 comments:
Donna, I like where you're going with this. I like your blog.
Jeff
Thanks Jeff, that means everything to me.
(via email)
Oh Donna, I loved your blogs. Thanks for sending me the link!
Your personal thinking on life and the gospel deserve a thoughtful, well-honed response from me. But I rarely have one handy. My current thought is that it is probably better to reply with shallowness than not to reply at all. So here is my Facebook-length shallow-looking response:
I loved your blog. I love you. I have a cat in my lap.
Love, Marilyn
Marilyn: Thank you! This post, though, was just one long ramble, with some editing. I don't regret anything I said. More time on it, though, would have shortened it.
Post a Comment